Jump to content

Zigzagmtart

Verified
  • Content Count

    97
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

18 Forum reputation = neutral

About Zigzagmtart

  • Rank
    Forum newbie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Oregon, USA

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={D5746370-7E50-4504-906F-E832BA7B94D5}&name=John+Trax
  • Images
    11686
  • Joined Alamy
    23 Oct 2011

Recent Profile Visitors

1,273 profile views
  1. Allan, I use the Lightroom plugin for all my Alamy uploads. Have done so for perhaps 3 maybe 4 years. I would not be without it. It allows a Lightroom workflow that meshes with what I am already doing. Note however that if your Lightroom keywords are a mess then the plugin is not going to help. I am meticulous about keeping my Lightroom keyword library in good shape so it works well for me. Best, John
  2. As far as I have ever been able to determine LR always uses alphabetical sorting for keywords. Using Jim Keir's plugin alters this somewhat if you allow it to prioritize but then you are using the sort order of the plugin. Adobe keeps making 'improvements' to LR but not much has changed with the keywording which for me is of a much higher priority than some other things. But unfortunately we stock shooters must be a small segment of the user population.
  3. As others have reported anything I have tagged with 'mural' has been flagged and marked as editorial by Alamy. I asked Alamy what the difference between 'editorial' and 'unreleased' was and the reply was: So it seems 'editorial' and 'unreleased' are essentially the same but perhaps 'editorial' is a little more emphatic? Anyway, curious how others mark their images with unreleased people or property? Should we go back and add 'editorial' to them all? Or am I overthinking this?
  4. I usually consider taking the photo to be about 10% of the work. Uploading, title, description, keywords is the rest. I fill out everything I can that applies.
  5. I never really pay much attention to my CTR but this post made me look. On the rolling 1 year screen on the dashboard my CTR is .46 which is about what I remember it being whenever I bothered to look before. However, if I click on My Images the screen there shows a CTR of .31 for the rolling 1 month. And looking at the chart on the dashboard my CTR has ranged from a high of .70 in August of 2017 to a low of .08 in November of 2017. It has since crawled back up to .31. I uploaded steadily in June and July of 2017 but health and work got in the way and I uploaded not
  6. The good news about bad old images, is that the skills have improved so you know (now) that they are bad. It is always good to look at old work and compare to current skills just to see the improvement.
  7. Thanks! I have all my keywords already done in Lightroom, so using only 4 is not going to work unless I change my workflow. It does seem that the license can be changed after they clear QC, but I am still not clear on what happens if something goes live and is sold before I change the license. Oh well, that's never going to happen anyway so maybe best not to worry :):)
  8. Trying to come to grips with the new image manager. I have two pseudo's one for RF and one for RM. The default appears to be RF and the pseudo is correct for that. But when uploading via the image manager how do I change the psuedo and license if that batch is intended to be RM? It appears those can be changed after the fact, but the image is at that point already on sale, and I thought you could not change the license after the image was on sale? Maybe it is just that simple but I'm confused. Would anyone care to clarify please?
  9. If none of the sales are from "enhanced" then I do not understand what you are trying to say. Seems the non-enhanced ones are selling better? And by enhanced to you mean the "super tags"? If so there is a comment on the Alamy blog that alleges that using "Super tags" actually drops a particular image by many pages in the rank. No comment back from Alamy.
  10. You are correct and if the portfolio is too large for single drives then there is of course no choice. Lightroom really does not care, the preference for single drives is to make backup easier and to present a cleaner look in the folder view. But as you say, it is not necessary. Just preferred, IMHO, if it is possible. Mine are under a single directory on the server which has an 8tb raid array. Which appears as a single drive despite it being six physical drives. And, yes Martin Evening's book is excellent. Another one I have used is "Adobe Lightroom - the missing Manual" by Victor
  11. +100 on that. I love Lightroom and would not be without it, but it does take some work to set up. There are so many options in the preferences that it takes some real thought to get things the way you want. A few tips from hard won experience: 1) Organize your image library on disk first, before you even install Lightroom. All images should be under a single directory. Photos, Images, My Stuff, doesn't matter but all in one place. Note that Lightroom will accept any number of directories but if all images are in one place it greatly improves organization and also back up. All o
  12. Some might disagree but I cannot imagine doing any type of stock photography without using Lightoom. There is a learning curve, and the workflow is much different than a typical Photoshop workflow but IMHO it is well worth the time involved in setting it up and learning it.
  13. I sharpen to 25 in Lightroom. That is enough to overcome the RAW softness of my camera without overdoing it. It should be noted that a 'sharp' photograph has little to do with 'sharpening'. If it isn't 'sharp' as in "in focus" no amount of 'sharpening' is going to help. Sharpening is also a process and should have several stages. The initial sharpening, like my 25 in Lightroom, is to overcome the softness of the RAW file. After that you have creative sharpening which should be done with masks or other techniques to only emphasize what you want. And lastly there is output sharpen
  14. If you need / use Photoshop then CC @ $9.99 or ($7.99 if you look around) is a very good deal. However, if you only use Lightroom then perhaps you are better with the standalone though accept the fact you will not get the latest and greatest toys. But considering the problems with the last few iterations maybe that is not such a good idea. I've got the CC version and the problems with the last couple of versions aside, I'm quite happy. They really, really need to stop adding features and fix the bugs and performance issues though. I've got a fairly high end system and version 6 br
  15. I am thoroughly disgusted with myself. I guess I got careless. After 166 consecutive passed batches, I got a fail. That's what happens when you get overconfident and don't double check.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.