Jump to content

Quiensera

Verified
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Forum reputation = neutral

About Quiensera

  • Rank
    Forum newbie

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    http://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={1516A08C-7AE1-4278-B8EB-76B7B664D5ED}&name=Alex+Millauer
  • Images
    0
  • Joined Alamy
    13 Aug 2016
  1. Oh, okay, so if, let's say ten people would want to use the image at the same time, they could, even under that license? Would the buyer pay once and then have the rights to use the image as much as he wants, forever? Or only for a limited time? Or can I decide on a case by case basis what to do? What about pricing? Does Alamy decide on that or me? How would I know how much to charge? Just sorting it all out before uploading things, so I do everything correctly. I have almost 40,000 images on my computer and I'm sorting through them right now to see what would be usable. The nicer ones are mixed in with private ones as well, so it'll take a bit to see what I have. Does Alamy have FTP btw? Or do you upload the images from the website? Should I put metadata on the pics for descriptions, copyrights and such (I have photo mechanic)? Also, what about pics taken on private property, but busy areas, such as the conservatory at the Bellagio, casinos indoors, hotel lobbies, pool areas or the like, as long as I mark it RM and disclose that I don't have the releases, can I use these pics? Thanks!
  2. Hey, thanks for all of the responses, they are really helpful. I'm just trying to learn more about all of those technical terms, RM vs RF and such. So, I could not sell an image as RF and mark it as not having the releases, so the buyer could then use it in a non-commercial, strictly editorial way? It would always have to be RM? As long as he doesn't use it commercially, why couldn't I sell it as RF? It seems that RM is a lot more restrictive for the buyer and perhaps fewer people would buy a license marked as such? Plus, the person would then have the exclusive right to the image for a long time, so no one else could buy it? Unfortunately, I don't have the greatest camera in the world, so I don't know if I could compete with the super-sharp, heavily photoshopped, most amazing images already out there (especially if we are talking places like Vegas, where a lot of great pics exists already), so generally RF may be a better choice for those. Then again, everyone with pics that have recognizable people or buildings may be in the same situation. Again, still trying to figure it all out. Thanks a lot for your help!
  3. Hi, I'm completely new to Alamy or selling photographs online and I just have a legal question which confuses me a bit: In addition to others, I have a lot of nice pictures that were taken from public streets but feature recognizable buildings in the background (for example from the Vegas strip. Pics that show some of the hotels in the background, day or night) Also cityscape views taken from my room that show a number of the hotels, but from a far distance. One can read the hotel logos (such as "Caesar's Palace," "Bally's" etc, but, again, it's at a distance, no real details of the hotels themselves.) Can such pictures be sold, or would I need permission from every single hotel in the shot? What if the shot shows one entire hotel (Bellagio with fountains in foreground, for example.) I could understand if it is for commercial use, such as someone using the pictures for T-shirts, mugs etc, but what if someone writes a blog or news article about Vegas and just needs a pic to accompany the story? There are plenty of street shots in newspapers, I can't imagine that the photographer would need permission from absolutely everyone and everything in the picture in such instances, they just need a nice shot of the place they are writing about. Could I specify it's for newspaper use only and still submit the picture? What if there is a movie poster or product such as a soft drink in a picture? Do I need permission from all of those companies as well, even if it's not for commercial use? Sorry if that's a dumb question, but it just confuses me, because it would seem that most bloggers/newspapers have more use for shots of hotels/landmarks/cityscapes than they do for the more artistic ones, and they have to get these shots from somewhere. If Alamy may not be the right place to sell those kinds of pictures, is there another site that does? What about sites that sell cell phone pics, are they less stringent about this? I may not be able to use Stockimo, since I don't have an I-phone. BTW, these pics would not have recognizable people in it, just wondering about the buildings. Thanks for any clarification!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.