Jump to content

Scott

Verified
  • Content Count

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Forum reputation = neutral

About Scott

  • Rank
    Forum newbie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Dallas, Texas, USA

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={C2740C83-2AA0-4FE8-9374-1E2F1A16BB03}&name=Scott+Goodno
  • Images
    2983
  • Joined Alamy
    22 Dec 2008
  1. I used an Indian company called ScanCafe to scan 1800 35mm slides and 4x5 negatives to TIFF. That was in 2010. Was pleased with the pricing, quality, communication and speed. Was able to review the scanned images online and approve them before they shipped CDs (or DVDs) - dont remember. Perhaps they can deliver in different ways now. All in all...no issues what so ever. I see that they are still online.
  2. Spot on Jeff. There is no data to suggest that in exchange for exclusivity, a 50/50 split has any benefit to a contributor, Or, that an exclusive license would not eventually return a 9.99$ sort of sale price.... Some stated that they are okay with this sort of split for exclusivity trade-off, in which case you maintain status quo, until Alamy decides that a 30 / 70 or worse split is need to fund operations or goose a growth initiative...
  3. Exclusivity, for those who contribute to multiple agencies or libraries, would reduce the contributor’s diversity of revenue streams and thus subject the contributor to greater, future Alamy pricing power over them, correct? Exclusivity may work when there is a guaranteed benefit or return to the contributor for not only sold image licenses but also for unsold images that they have restricted from sale through other libraries or agencies. After all, who is clairvoyant and knows what images, marked as exclusive on Alamy, would ever sell on Alamy? Alamy's current way of working regarding exc
  4. In light of the commission cut, Alamy's disregard for contributor's time to curate image galleries, the lack of leveraging AIM functionality for image search and selection, and lack of understanding on how Alamy's investment and intentions translate in increased Alamy image sales v alternatives....I will also turn off visibility and not burn anymore cycles on this. Looked interesting at first but quickly recognized another a less than half-baked solution.
  5. I wonder why Alamy did not leverage existing Alamy Image Manager's "filter and search" functionality to filter for KWs and image attributes, then allow a selection of the returned images to be assigned to a new or existing portfolio page? Alamy, through AIM's mandatory and optional data fields would make a very good start to populating and managing these portfolios. So....perhaps Alamy can better integrate the filter and search features in AIM, add a few more attribute selections (primary, secondary category, location, time for example) for a much better solution than what is there today.
  6. Hi Ed, Was wondering how your RX100/3 did in low light inside of La Parroquia? I am looking for a compact, Alamy suitable camera. I usually shoot at ISO 3200 with my D5MkIII inside churches and found that to be my limit in terms of balancing noise and shutter speed. The Sony RX100/x seems to have high marks, overall. For sure San Miguel is a beautiful city. If you want to take some side trips have a look at historic Queretaro, just 45-60 minutes away. A very photogenic city as well with its large centro historico. Scott
  7. Hi. Another update on Jim's plugin....specifically the "Set Alamy Metadata" feature. With the AIM data conversion, like some of you, I was left with tags that were duplicated, had separated multiword tags, and left orphaned annotation marks. It was a real amalgam of data conversion errors to be sure. As reported, Jim has been fixing issues with the plugin to work better with AIM. Working with Jim and team, I am now able to upload (set Alamy data) my pre-AIM LR plugin tags and supertags in order to correct the issues stated above. For those that have used this plugin prior to A
  8. Hi Marvin, Here are a few bits for you to consider regarding your original post. 1. Have a look at how the IRS classifies a hobby v. business. They may still see you as a hobby should you get audited and there goes your business expense deductions. 2. I don't believe you can deduct expenses for prior years when you were doing this for a hobby, unless perhaps you can restate (refile) prior years tax returns (professional help recommended). 3. Have a look at IRS Section 179 for options to fully deduct certain business expenses in the current tax year. 4. Marrianne posted a link to the I
  9. As others reported the plugin version 1.0.4852 had fixed the login issue but I am now getting a "500" error during the upload process. The error appears to be inconsistently thrown as well. First small test batch uploaded fine. Second batch failed at the last image. And this morning, the third batch failed immediately on the first image. I noticed too, that the OL number in LR metadata is not consistent with Alamy's track submissions page. The plug-in appears to not pickup the correct OL version assigned from Alamy when it logs in but instead uses a prior one. I don't believe the OL n
  10. Scott

    Manage Images

    Hi, In Manage Images, I would like to see larger thumbs, or at least have a choice of...small, med, large. Helps me to more quickly select pics for batch editing. Perhaps this is related or similar to Chris' request. Scott
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.