Jump to content

andremichel

Verified
  • Content Count

    522
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

222 Forum reputation = good

1 Follower

About andremichel

  • Rank
    Forum regular

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    www.antipas.photoshelter.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England
  • Interests
    No time for interests. Too busy keywording.

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={D77AF9BE-0C14-4F4E-9DAA-AC7212A6880E}&name=Andrew+Michael
  • Images
    12728
  • Joined Alamy
    02 Feb 2010

Recent Profile Visitors

3,046 profile views
  1. I do occasionally read your blog and find it entertaining. At times it feels more like "The Rose tinted guide to microstock photography" but maybe that is more of a reflection of how I currently see this industry. You certainly have amazing enthusiasm and work very hard for modest returns.
  2. This was my best month of 2019 in terms of gross revenue, but I've not been having a great year so nothing to write home about. Compared to 2018 earnings it would come a little above average. 22 sales for $661 gross.
  3. So basically the difference between old and new isn't as extreme as it first appears, due to the fact that it took a long time for early letters A to F to get used up and so covered a far longer time period than new letters. Having said that, old images have still been selling better than new, with 62% of images generating 76% of sales. You have given many good reasons for why that might be. There is also the initial delay between submitting, licensing and reporting of sales. With many libraries, old images gradually get sent to the back of searches as they age forcing contributors to stay on the treadmill constantly adding more. It doesn't appear to be the case with Alamy. In fact one of your comments may be suggesting the opposite: I am certainly surprised by this: BUT interestingly my older images retained their better ranking, and my new images took on the worse ranking. I wonder if this 'feature' is widespread across all contributors.
  4. Thanks for your really detailed response. I'll read and process in more detail tomorrow.
  5. With 79 sales your results are impressive as always, but what I find interesting is that the large majority of sales are from old images A to F; with only 19 sales from G onwards and just 4 sales that are M onwards. I am curious to understand if this is because you don't have many recent images or is it because old images sell better. How many of your images are G to W? How many of your images are M to W?
  6. Putting "premium images" on RH is a gamble that isn't paying off for me currently. I have slightly more images than you on there and my May statement had 2 sales for 44p net. Both distributor from big G. On the subject of microstock, for nearly 10 years I have been one of those fighting against the tide. Recently I've done the odd experiment with small numbers of images. For example only 7 images on the 'Tier 1 MS site' earned me $11 net last year. But with prices getting so low on Trad stock agencies, I don't know whether there is any point in resisting anymore - as I don't see much of a difference. A year ago I submitted my RM images to another Trad stock library, which then distributed them to big G and several other places. I am talking trad stock RM not ms. I recently received my quarterly statement with 164 sales. A handful were good prices with one grossing $$$$, but after both libraries got their teeth into it I got just $190 from that one sale. What was really shocking though, was that 140 out of 164, were below $10 gross and many below $1. The lowest one earned me just 3 cents.
  7. This is just a theory, but I suspect that Alamy may have used much of their cash grab from non exclusives to focus more on the North American market. This is resulting in those whose ports are best suited for North America doing better, while the rest of us are languishing this year. I draw this from what James West said in his infamous Youtube video where he said "it worked last time around" (i.e. in 2012 when they opened the US office from their previous royalty cut). Also from some of what the other James said during the Cambridge meeting, implying the Alamy brand could do with better exposure in the USA. Also, though not particularly scientific I get the impression that more doom and gloom on this forum, is coming from this side of the pond, while more positive posts (like Rick's) are coming from the other side.
  8. Probably in the same way as $$$ have become rare on Alamy. There used to be a huge gulf between Trad and micro prices. Now looking at my Trad agency statements, I can't see a big difference. I don't count subs as they aren't a like for like comparision with Alamy.
  9. My average net on alamy is currently $8 net from 91 sales this year, so interesting to compare. Excluding subs (which are all about super high volume) , I don't think the difference is that great these days.
  10. What does ODD and SOD stand for? What is the gross license amount for non subs? I am wondering how close to Alamy's dwindling price level they are.
  11. After a solid 2018, 2019 is fast becoming a trainwreck that shows no signs of improvement.
  12. You are one of Alamys biggest success stories, so much so that Alamy use your story as PR to recruit newbie contributors. But even you aren't making a living wholly from stock on Alamy, even with 55k images. So what chance does a newbie have just starting out? Also Live news doesn't count as stock and is not an option for most contributors anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.