Jump to content

Phil Robinson

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Phil Robinson

  1. I've never seen the attraction of camera straps that attach to the tripod bush on the bottom of the camera. I imagine the camera must bounce around much more. I see nothing wrong with the strap that came with the camera, fixed to the two lugs provided for the purpose, over the shoulder as Russell describes above. Can anyone enlighten me?
  2. After two really bad months, February was good - better than average - thanks largely to a surge on the afternoon of the 27th. High hopes for March - lurking around Westminster in the last weeks seems to be paying off.
  3. Whereas I've had a really depressing last couple of months, and this one is looking MUCH better.
  4. Have a look right at the bottom of the page (not 'joking' as such - it is there on the one I looked at. Good use of the phrase 'pulling my leg' from a non-native speaker though!)
  5. Would that be the Microstock site that feels the need to put a link to the Modern Slavery Act on their homepage?
  6. It's certainly worth going through to check for those exclusive images. I had one today for $119 which I had managed to get round to, so I got the 50%
  7. I shoot what I think will sell, (and a bit of what I enjoy photographing, that I hope might sell) based on experience of which of my 36,600 pics on file have sold and been zoomed (though sales are more important) over many months/years. Of course up-to-date info is useful, but I don't suddenly become a novice with no idea what to photograph because some statistics aren't updated. Yesterday I was the only photographer in Downing Street as ministers and potential defectors came and went. I wasn't there for fun (it wasn't) but because years of experience told me that was the place to be and I doubted that had changed in the last three weeks (one sale found so far, in The Sun unfortunately).
  8. AIM is very useful and I hope the information is available again soon, but I don't find myself suddenly at a total loss as to what to photograph because I haven't seen the zooms for three weeks. I'm still getting sales and years of recent experience aren't wiped out after a month without statistics. Having said that, yes, I'd like to see measures back soon.
  9. My dad still has that original 1959 'More Of Tom Lehrer' album - we grew up with it (and yes, I know all the words)
  10. Also 8 at 1.25. NU. To a commercial site with 20 million visitors a month. Opt out in April.
  11. No, I don't think you can. You could try contacting Alamy and asking them to do it.
  12. Interesting to hear that many clients get in touch with Alamy researchers to find images for them rather than searching the website - and that the categories in AIM are used mostly by those Alamy staff - I'll keep filling them in.
  13. It's not much fun, but AT LEAST as important as taking great photos. You may have taken the best photo in the history of photography, but if nobody finds it, it's not going to sell.
  14. https://theculturetrip.com/europe/france/paris/articles/20-unmissable-attractions-in-paris/ Steve Tulley x2 John Kellerman Peter Horree olrat x2 Ayhan Altun Godong Fabrizzio Robba Janet Ridley Perry van Munster me Ilyas Ayub Susan Montgomerie Jamie Gray Francois Roux VogelSP Andrea Izzotti Patric Schadler Chris Wilson Don't get too excited - despite being on the website of one of Forbes 'fastest growing companies to watch' who invested over $22million in the last two years, with over 1600 articles and 20 million visitors a month, these were sold as 'novel use' and you probably got your 62c on 31st January.
  15. Remember turning that bar green doesn't trigger anything that suddenly makes your image more discoverable or higher ranking. In itself, it means nothing. It is meant to be an indication of whether you have added enough stuff, but is, objectively, in the opinion of some, perhaps (definitely) almost meaningless. If you have a picture of a cat and add the names of fifty dog breeds as tags, the line will turn green. But is that necessarily a good idea...?
  16. I have often (too often) seen images, especially news, published that I thought might be mine but turned out to be taken by the photographer standing next to me. The images might be almost indistinguishable but my version is still exclusive to Alamy if I haven't sent it anywhere else. If I send two almost identical images taken half a second apart to two different agencies, however, that's a different matter.
  17. I'm going through mine by subject - best-selling subjects first. Search on one computer with a keyword on Alamy and use the same search on my laptop an my other (main) agent, then see what comes up on both. Select all, then go through unclicking the ones I find on the other site before chosing 'exclusive to Alamy'. I am planning to check everything that gets zoomed on an image by image basis as they are the ones you know might sell soon. With nearly 40,000 images it's a big job and I don't expect to be finished any time soon.
  18. Interesting question Using filters: 15,543 Using keyword 'people' : 1839 'person' ; 855 I've been adding it as a tag recently - looks like I didn't much in the past.
  19. Brazil, again? A few years ago we had sales to Brazil written off because the distributor had gone bust / run away.
  20. Anyway it is good evidence to prove you should get live news rates and not $6.12
  21. Thanks again Bryan - you do an amazing job, much appreciated by those of us too lazy to do it ourselves.
  22. duplicated (if your post doesn't appear immediately, give it a minute...)
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.