Jump to content

Charles Stirling

Verified
  • Content Count

    116
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

73 Forum reputation = neutral

About Charles Stirling

  • Rank
    Forum regular

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={7DFBA633-BE6D-4538-B8C4-C596BAF58AB4}&name=Charles+Stirling
  • Images
    10446
  • Joined Alamy
    16 Jan 2004

Recent Profile Visitors

457 profile views
  1. I have taken a photo of a sign with beach and cliffs behind in Wales thinking no one else would bother with this and after putting it up had a look and about 4 or 5 of the same sign and view were already up by other photographers. At times wonder if anything exists which hasn't been photographed.
  2. I've had one pop up on Windows 10 random splash screen of Sydney credited to Taras Vyshnya/Alamy but I can't find it.
  3. I asked members services about possible changes in what was acceptable with reference to part being sharp with parts being out of focus. They responded that criteria haven't changed. They went back and looked at my recent fails on these grounds and decided had been too harsh and reinstated them. My guess is that its a very overworked team checking and with a quick glance they see out of focus aspects the whole image isn't checked but instead a quick reject happens. Anyway thanks to QC team for reviewing.
  4. I had gone years without a failure but recently have had a number for “Soft or lacking definition” when the main part of the image was sharp but part was out of focus as is often the case with close-ups. In the past I thought these would have passed so wondering if the QC methods have changed. The criteria don't really address this well, but I get the impression now images found in search like C6CT1N, T3YG4R or RKBEF5 might fail maybe because of automated processing.
  5. I also have found the doubling up of keywords in many of my older images. I haven't downloaded the CSV file yet so not sure what that may show. I have manually gone through some older images and removed the doubling but too many to do this.
  6. I have two businesses on the insistence of HMRC, photography plus a tool business. Some aspects of the two overlap and HMRC accepted that I put all the small overlapping expenses under one or the other but to do it consistently. Travel in UK is by car and not a huge expense so do a percent for personal and business which was approved by HMRC and stopped trying to keep mileage (1 mile here, 4 miles their, 60 miles somewhere, etc.) which has been accepted in an audit. Overseas generally goes as a photo expense as most of the time taking photographs.
  7. Starsphinxm commented on my suggestion that instead of resubmitting a live news photos as stock just to move it into standard QC. My thought was that sometimes a good live news photo might not be up to the quality that you would want for stock. If it is up to stock quality maybe even submitting at the same time with standard stock keywords etc. could work. Not having it automaticly go into stock might prevent any misuse of Live News as a way of bypassing QC.
  8. I was surprised at all the NASA images sold on Alamy. All free from NASA as paid for by public so why would anyone want to pay for them, but maybe simply better search option?
  9. It's been a long time since I was active in news, used to be able to get photos from taking, film processing and to printers in 5 to 10 minutes. With Alamy I seldom uploaded to live news, a fire, an event, an accident but non of national UK importance. What would have been a more pleasant and helpful approach would be more specific guidelines such as NO non-UK news unless world shattering, no non-national unless very important. Then maybe have a separate news feed for “soft” news with quality requirements not dissimilar to stock. To stop both of these being used as back door to stock not to roll them into stock but just delete after say 5 and 10 days. Good ones to be resubmitted as stock as normal. As I see it Hard news needs to be topical and now, softer news interesting but timely, stock good but long term. Alamy doesn't seem to be good at selling hard news, maybe not the accredited photographers to do enough of it. Can Alamy get photogs access to inside Downing street, inside European courts, etc. for news? Probably not, probably not interested maybe important to being a news agency. I would like to see a new in between submission which isn't as exclusive; not 1 hour but 2 to 3 hour submission times while not being that back door to stock entry. Only keep for short time and delete or take offline and delete a bit latter.
  10. Sales up a little, revenue down a little with a slow increase in total numbers by about 10 percent.
  11. Like most here I feel the 50/50 split should stay, it's already difficult to even cover costs at the photographers end so driving the market photos taken as a bi-product of another activity. The last reduction from 60/40 was supposed to bring benefits; it may have but only to Alamy not contributors who generally didn't see much of an upturn in either prices or quantity sold. So will this 20% reduction to contributors see major sales increases? Last time I hoped it would, now more dubious.
  12. Some of mine don't have the work "mural" in them nor any actual artwork such as: so it does seem a bit over the top.
  13. The video is alarmist maybe right, but remember the German situation where they couldn't show the face of the wanted person due to personal privacy issue and data protection. The concept in France that need permission to photograph anyone. Maybe we do need to keep a watchful eye on this legislation.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.