-
Content Count
31 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
23 Forum reputation = neutralAbout ArthurGebuysPhotography
-
Rank
Forum newbie
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Bergen, Norway
Alamy
-
Alamy URL
https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={F30DDEFB-C1F3-46E4-B5FF-F6ED0E40DE34}&name=Arthur+Gebuys
-
Images
2467
-
Joined Alamy
08 Oct 2004
-
ArthurGebuysPhotography started following Any correlation between your Stockimo sales and the Ratings?, Personal Use, Re-Keywording....is it worth the effort. Will it pay off? and and 1 other
-
After reading through the Forum the last couple of days (yes the trust is gone!), I saw a lot of mentioning that personal use was tied up with distribution sales. So when one would restrict ones images for PU, one would also loose the distribution sales... Not true! I asked MS yesterday and they confirmed that this is no longer the case, so one can easily restrict all images from PU now without loosing the distribution sales. <quote> Hi Arthur, Restricting your images for personal use no longer opts your images out of the distribution pool. The distributors can choose not to accept them, but this is rare, so you can restrict your images and still be included in distribution. Thanks, Siobhan <unquote> Have a great weekend all. Arthur
-
Hi, anyone want to share their Stockimo sales average / low / high mine: $32,50 / $1,59 / $122,68 Update (13/07): $23,57 / $0,12 (SS-Sales) /$122,68 /Arthur
-
Hi, How high is the percentage of perfect scores (4/4) you got so far from the Stockimo rating team? Mine 0,97% /1436 images /Arthur
- 10 replies
-
- Stockimo
- highscores
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
In 2007 I Alamy licenced one of my (bird) images for the use in an almanac on birdlife... So far so good. The licence however was isued in 2007 with a license period from Start: 31 August 2007 to End: 31 August 2010. Recently I found the image being use in a book (apparently the same book, but reprint/rerun). I asked Alamy MS about it and they said that it falls under the license from 2007... the funny thing though is that that license was issued until august 2010 and the book we are talking about did not hit the shelfs before 2011... Am I being ridiculous in thinking that this should have been a new license or...?
-
And so I got paid for this use... I will end up with a grand total of... $1.60 The disturbing part though is that I needed to chase this (third party) sale myself, and that they now gave out a 1 year licence from the first of Febr this year for an image that has been used since February 2014... Can somebody by the way explain me how this works... Start: 01 February 2016 End: 01 February 2021 Duration: 1 year How can a license have a duration of one year.. start in 2016 and end in 2021??? Mmm, it is a good thing that for me this is just a hobby... but I can see how this is really frustrating if you try to make a living out of this sh!t! Happy Easter people, ;-D Arthur
-
I got a reply from MS today stating: "We've just heard back from our Distribution team and the usage of your image AR7T92 will be billed in March." We are talking about an image used in febr. 2014 here... so nice that they, after some encouragement from my side, now are willing to pay what they owe next month, more then 2 years after the fact... will be excited to see how much I will earn on this use... maybe $ 1,50. Not negative, just a realist! Not liking much the this business is developing... I think I have found 5 none paid for images this last year. And this is not infringements, this is images obtained via among others Alamy, that are not paid for by the distrutor or direct client... Arthur