Jump to content

Bill Kuta

Verified
  • Content Count

    427
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bill Kuta


  1. I have a bunch of Personal Use sales over the last year, that all say:

     

        Usage: Personal use, Personal prints, cards and gifts. Non-commercial use only, not for resale.
        Media: Non-commercial, one time, personal/home use

     

    and all are for $19.99.

     

    How come an NU print run of 1,000 costs one-fourth the price of a one-time PU?

     

    (I've been opted out of NU since 2007.)


  2. 16 minutes ago, isphoto said:

     I would much rather see a min $/£25 per use, this would negate most peoples issues with pu. I do not see why i should pay more in car park ing to get a shot, than what someone gets to pay for the image, it is fundamentally wrong.

     

    +1

    And to pile on further, I'll say what some others have--though I am not currently opting images out of PU, I do occasionally reconsider. When I looked at the last year's sales, I was surprised at how many were for PU (or presentation).

    • Upvote 1

  3. I currently allow PU sales, but I've never cared for the way the terms are stated, with plurals for "prints, cards and gifts," and "not for commercial use, not for resale."  What's not for resale, the downloaded image, or resulting prints, cards and gifts? How many PU buyers know what "commercial use" means?

     

    I personally understand what is meant, but how about someone looking for images to put on cards they intend to sell? I suspect they will interpret most favorably for themselves.

     

    And if Alamy is catering to the professional image buyer market, why list Personal Use and Presentation first? The usages don't all have to be in ascending price order.

     

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 4

  4. Hi Rob -  A lot of forum threads will show you that lots of Alamy shooters ( well, forumites anyway) have been using aps-c and full-frame mirrorless for a long time now, and even cameras with 1" sensors, especially the Sony RX-100's. I've been using the Sony a6000/a6300 etc for several years now with nary a QC issue.

    • Upvote 1

  5. Yeah, I can identify with this profile--definitely a loner (but married 51 years so far). 

     

    Not sure that the ability to work well under pressure is relevant to whether one does stock. I've always worked very well under pressure (used to say I work only under pressure, but that gives the wrong impression).

     

    The ability to work under pressure affects how I do stock photography when I'm at a site, applying self-pressure to maximize the opportunity. But we all do that.


  6. A youthful mid-70's here. (My wife recently got a birthday card from my sister. Outside of card: "We're not getting older, we're getting better."  Inside of card: "Now you say it to me."  They both have August birthdays.)

     

    I also got my first SLR in 1968, from the PX catalog while in Vietnam (along with stereo system and all the other stuff everybody got). But didn't get into stock until about 2000, anticipating retirement from the paying job.


  7. Looks like you're covered for USA, Betty.

     

    The issue only came up for me this morning because I was looking at AofA on an iPad. I entered "Washington DC" as a search term, and iOS suggested "Washington, D.C.", which I accepted. If some buyers use mobile devices for searching, they could also be sidetracked into suboptimal search terms. (A suboptimal search term is one that I don't have ūüôĀ)


  8. This came back to my attention this morning while looking through All of Alamy searches. I've known about this for years, but also seem to have forgotten it for years. Apologies to those for which this is old hat.

     

    Let's take Washington, DC.  "DC" is the official US Post Office designation for "D.C.", which is an abbreviation for District of Columbia. 

     

    If you enter a keyword of "D.C.", any subsequent search for it on Alamy will strip out the punctuation and search for "d c".

     

    If you enter a keyword of "DC", the Alamy search will look for "dc".

     

    If you have only one of "DC" and "D.C." keywords for an image, that image will not come up for the other keyword.

     

    Searches on those two keywords show that some images have both and some have only one or the other. And All of Alamy results show that both forms are used for searches.

     

    There are lots of other examples, such as "USA" vs "U.S.A."

     

    So my questions:  How much do you take this into account for keywording? What are some major examples?

     

     


  9. What clearest is when they say you are prohibited from making any money from images of their property. And that's probably what some of them mean when they say no commercial photography. Or some might be parroting language from their liability insurer concerning possible hazards from tripods etc. And some want to monetize commercial photography with fees. 


  10. I agree that such statements usually refer to commercial shoots with tripods and lights that can get in the way and create hazards.

     

    Sometimes I have tried to discuss with the staff that I shoot stock photography. In almost all cases, they don't know anything about stock photography and their eyes glaze over.

     

    In my view, the line "No problem with publicising, you can use them for your own purposes" in the reply to Geogphotos indicates that their eyes glazed over too.

     

    In general, I think that when the rules are unclear, it's better to apologize and take photos down than to never have put them up.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.