Jump to content

Bill Kuta

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bill Kuta

  1. I figured if they retained both, it would be like offering f1.8 and 1.4 85mm, which is classic.
  2. B&H has the a6000 body only now for $448. I have the a6000 and a6300. I don't see that any of the subsequent models were that big of an improvement, unless you wanted the in-body stabilization of the a6500. Heck, I'm still using my NEX-6 with kit 16-50mm--my recent non-archive shots were all taken with it. Just too handy a size.
  3. I've been wondering why Sigma stopped making the aps-c 60mm ART lens, which has been one of the sharpest e-mount lenses on photozone. I have it and it is very sharp, currently doing service digitizing old 6cm slides. It wouldn't necessarily have competed with the new 56mm--the 60mm cost less but was f2.8, neither is stabilized.
  4. I checked on that website, and no problem with the email I use for Alamy.
  5. Ever since we've had the new sign-in window this week, whenever I sign in, I get a pop-up message from Chrome that a data breach in a site or app has exposed my password, and that I should change it. Anybody else getting this?
  6. For 35mm slides, I've been wiping with a lens cloth, then with a lens brush, then a blower. Shooting with an APS-C Canon SL1, extension tube, 50mm macro, spacer ring, and ES-1, shooting into a florescent studio light. For 120-size (6x6 cm) slides, I'm shooting with an APS-C Sony a3000 (great use for this odd model), extension tube, Sigma 60mm ART lens, and lightbox on a little copy stand. If the slide (all family shots from the 40's - 60's) is in a glass and metal mount, I remove it from the mount, wipe it with a PEC pad and 99% isopropyl, put it on the lightbox and cover (flatten) it with a piece of glass. Then I put it back in the mount. If it's in glass taped together with black tape, I don't disassemble that but wipe the glass and put it on the lightbox. Both setups allow me to do a zoom focus using the lcd. I'll be doing test shots for both scenarios regarding apertures. The setup for the 120 slides assures flatness.
  7. I've shot about 3-400 slides, and am generally pleased with the results, but today I'm wondering what is the optimal aperture and why. A search of the forum topic we're in shows recommendations of 6.3 to 11. Googling on the internet doesn't show many specific recommendations, mostly f8 or 11. But one link was from someone shooting at f4.5 (full-frame) who claims that it makes the dust/scratches very out of focus. I'm skeptical of this. But I'm going to try some test shots with a variety of apertures. I realize the optimal aperture depends on whether you're shooting full-frame or APS-C. (I'm APS-C, and mostly shooting old family shots, but also some Alamy archival.) Edit: I guess I'm mostly questioning why we need a lot of depth of field. Slides are flat. Maybe we want the shallowest depth of field that still has edge-to-edge sharpness.
  8. This month is historically average for me, but for the year I'm way down on revenue and now down on sales. My FAA net is threatening to overtake my Alamy gross for the year.
  9. Good-looking slide scans, Ollie. On the several I looked at, I see that your Date Taken is the recent date when you scanned them, and captions don't indicate a date. I think it could maximize a buyer's interest in an archival image to know the original capture date, or a best approximation.
  10. Ed, what I've been carrying for 2-3 years now is a bag with a6000/10-18mm, and a6300/18-105mm. The 18-105mm is a G lens, f4, with internal focus and zoom. Been working fine for Alamy purposes. It's $650 at most places; I see Walmart, of all places, has a few for $570. Downsides of the 18-105 are: it's zoom-by-wire, which doesn't bother me; and if it's idle for a few minutes, it reverts to widest-angle, which I find annoying.
  11. If you submit images from your 1000D, then the next QC surprise could be dust spots. If you've done much changing of lenses on it (or even not), there could be dust specks on the sensor. When you're post-processing your raw images, be sure to check each image at 100%, especially sky areas, for grayish spots, and clone out any that you find.
  12. August was average for me, a couple of mid-$$ sales. But I'm way off for the year so far. For 2020 ytd, FAA has provided me with over twice as much net as Alamy.
  13. Thanks all, so far! I might be trying a couple of free trials. Photoshelter is appealing--I know a lot of you use it, I'd have relative confidence in its long-term viability, and it looks like it includes a domain name. The Basic 4Gb should be ample for jpegs, for a family archive. I used to have my own web site but let it lapse because I wasn't using it.
  14. As I've mentioned in another thread, I'm using some pandemic time to root through old slides/negatives/prints, and digitize selected images. I started off on a particular topic, but have expanded scope to try to digitize selected images from all pre-digital years. Our digital family collection starts in 2000; the old slides start about 1940, with prints going back to around 1900. I expect it will amount to a couple thousand images or perhaps a lot more. I'm curating with inclusion in mind. I'm shooting the 35mm slides and negatives and 6cm slides with DSLRs, and will be scanning prints with flatbeds, and am happy with those techniques and results. I'm not looking for advice on this aspect. I'm post-processing with Lightroom, and am pretty satisfied with restoring colors, removing color casts, etc. I'll be posting the results to some hosting site for family use, and will want search capabilities, so am trying to build in any metadata/keywords that will be needed. So far, I've put best-determined year-month in the keywords, added rudimentary captions, and changed the metadata capture dates. I've decided to add to the keywords: names of people in the image; year; location; event; maybe image source (family collection, medium). I want to avoid continually coming up with more types of keywords and repeatedly backfilling what I've already done, so any advice on keywords/metadata will be much appreciated. For a hosting site, some suggestions have been Smugmug, Adobe Portfolio, and Google Photos. I'm looking for security, good search capabilities that will use my metadata/keywords, ease of adding more images, low cost, and a record of site permanence. Any discussion and suggestions are welcome. I also welcome discussion of everything I have not thought of for this project. thanks Bill Kuta
  15. What if you're looking for a particular image or type of image but don't remember when you took it?
  16. Yep, $3.62 here too. Apparently the ASCRL process produces a group average payment, not individualized like DACS?
  17. I don't know if it's been noted here yet, but clearly we are not the only people doing this during the pandemic. Equipment and supplies like the ES-1&2 are back-ordered and have been for some time (thankfully, since shortly after I received my ES-1). Some lightboxes in short supply too. I ordered the ES-2 as well, for the ease in digitizing negative filmstrips, but recently cancelled the back-ordered order when I figured I could just temporarily put a filmstrip in a fold-over cardboard slide mount and use the ES-1. I haven't tried this yet, as I haven't yet received said slide mounts, which I had to order from a crafts person on Etsy--slide mounts are scarce as well. Also copying some old 120 transparencies using a lightbox/cheap copy stand set-up. This is almost all for digitizing our large collection of family shots from two generations of two families, but I'm also pulling out archival-worthy shots as I go.
  18. How big are they? Many of them are kind of fingerling shape, but look too big.
  19. Still very accessible. Recently I wanted to start using Vuescan again after about 15 years of non-use, but needed a new key for the updated version. I queried, and Ed Hamrick accommodated me. But after trying some scans with my Canon FS4000, I saw that my set-up shooting slides with a Canon dslr, Nikon ES-1, and various other tubes/rings/spacers was way faster and yielded better results.
  20. I found that one result of this--refund of a cleared sale and resale for the same amount--reduces your cleared funds by the amount of the original sale, until the resale clears. A byproduct for Alamy is a temporary cash-flow advantage.
  21. Back when I was still carrying a Canon 5D and a couple of lenses, I used a Lowepro Outback 200 (or maybe a predecessor model) modular belt pack. I really liked using that format--saved the shoulders from the bag weight--but apparently not enough other people did, as it's no longer available. I thought I had sold it, but recently came across it during a major Covid cleanup. Might try it with the Sony mirrorless. But if you're looking for discreet, it does scream "PHOTOGRAPHER".
  22. Way back in the day when we ran programs on a mainframe through remote terminals, I would tell people that the more they clicked on the job status, the faster it would run.
  23. I use a small nondescript bag (Ape Case AC540BL) to carry two Sony APS-C mirrorless with lenses (they fit just right, lenses up). The bag is nylon with typical padding panels on bottom and sides with a moveable panel for creating two compartments. There's a front compartment that can hold two chargers, extra batteries and cards, and more (small pockets in that compartment for the small items). In the main compartment, there is room on the ends between the padding panels and bag to put a small table tripod, lenspen kit, even a water bottle after I remove a camera. For air travel, the whole thing fits in the bottom half of my carry-on backpack. When I'm ready to shoot, I put one camera around my neck and the bag crossed over to a shoulder. Or both cameras (and bag) crossed over shoulders. I've been using this arrangement (and original bag) for eight years with no problems. Currently carrying a Sony a6300 with 18-105mm, and a6000 with 10-18mm.
  24. Three for a total of $50.50 (isn't everything?). Year to date, about 50% of last year's sales and 25% of revenue. I like the zooms, though. Might make a casserole of them for dinner.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.