
liverpix
Verified-
Content count
84 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
8 Forum reputation = neutralAbout liverpix
-
Rank
Forum newbie
Alamy
-
Alamy URL
https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={974CE151-26D7-41AE-8541-B3C9C34F326D}&name=Pak+Hung+Chan
-
Images
1142
-
Joined Alamy
11 Jul 2009
-
Failed for Softness, Noise.
liverpix replied to liverpix's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical queries
If I shoot at f8 or f11, that would mean slowing down my shutter speed quite a bit. Maybe as slow as 1/20 sec. I guess I could use a monopod; a tripod could get in peoples' way. Thanls for the advice.- 22 replies
-
- soft
- lacking definition
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Failed for Softness, Noise.
liverpix replied to liverpix's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical queries
Thanks.- 22 replies
-
- soft
- lacking definition
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Failed for Softness, Noise.
liverpix replied to liverpix's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical queries
Thanks for your replies. I may have to take another look at shooting RAW. Never got the hang of processing them.- 22 replies
-
- soft
- lacking definition
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Failed for Softness, Noise.
liverpix replied to liverpix's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical queries
https://www.flickr.com/photos/liverpix/32021065087/in/dateposted-public/ This is 100% crop of centre.- 22 replies
-
- soft
- lacking definition
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
liverpix started following DACS payment, Failed for Softness, Noise., Another noise reection and and 1 other
-
Hi, I recently had this photo of the Cavern Clun rejected for being Soft or lacking definition, Noise. What do you think ?
- 22 replies
-
- soft
- lacking definition
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Another noise reection
liverpix replied to liverpix's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical queries
Maybe, but that should come under blemishes and not noise. -
Another noise reection
liverpix replied to liverpix's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical queries
Yes, I noticed the circle on the left too (after I got the rejection) - I think I must have used the wrong spot healing brush. The circles were not on the original photo but on the copy I sent in. -
Another noise reection
liverpix replied to liverpix's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical queries
I was shooting in jpeg. I don''t think it's noisy, nether do you it seems but Alamy seems to think so for some reason. -
rejected images have been rejected without being assessed
liverpix replied to danielmckay's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical queries
It's like what the OP said.He may have to submit the same 41 images time and time again. That wastes time. All Alamy needs to do is reect the bad ones and let the good one through in one go thus saving a lot of time. -
I've just had another photo rejected for noise. Photo taken on a Sony Nex 5N at ISO 400. Last photo to be rejected for noise was taken on the RX100, 5N has bigger sensor. What do you think ? https://postimg.cc/image/yam9zvrl7/
-
rejected images have been rejected without being assessed
liverpix replied to danielmckay's topic in Alamy Quality Control and technical queries
I do understand Daniel McKay's point of view. I always thought that Alamy should just throw out the bad one/s and put through the good ones in one go. It would save time and trouble for both the photographer and Alamy. -
It's ok. I found the DAC payment in Account Balance and not Sales history.
-
Thanks, I'll contact them.
-
Thanks for your replies. I normally shoot in jpgs as was this photo, mainly because I tend to take a lot of photos and I never really got my head round RAW. I just had a look at my camera settings. There is a High ISO NR on my RX100; it was set on Normal - I have now changed it to High.
-
Thanks. Only my photo sales are in my Sales History, no other income..