Rico

Thankyou for the compliment Betty. It was taken at the Calgary Carifest Parade a few years ago. One of my favorite events for the abundance of photo opportunities. This photograph is still a stunner for me.

Unbelievably, this has never been sold.

Also, there is a wonderful 2014 documentary on his photography and ecological work called "The Salt of the Earth". Worth a look if you can find it.

Llama llove in Ecuador. I think this is my first calendar sale on Alamy.

Television and print media, placed within body of show. The Rainbow Family gathers at the Chief Mountain Border Crossing between Alberta and Montana for a peaceful celebration. July 4, 1976

I guess the good news is that if you tried to put that image on an album cover or anything else today, you would probably wind up in jail.

Oh, I forgot to mention... He is also suing the photographer Kirk Weddle

I'm not an internet lawyer but, I am guessing this will settle out of court. The "baby" stands to make something from this.

Here's the link https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/nevermind-baby-nirvana-album-cover-sues-band-1.6153080 This should be interesting.

Commercial electronic media website Treaty 6 flag flying in the First Nations Cree community of Maskwacis, Alberta Canada

I don't think that it's a term but an actual website. Maybe this one. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/ I could be wrong.

What I believe is that it's time for a beer

I don't remember saying I was perfect anywhere in this forum. As for the child begging photo, it was taken in Myanmar where the mother was standing next to her giving implied consent. That's how some people make a living in third world countries. Inappropriate maybe, that's what this discussion is about. You're probably right, some of my images are inappropriate. Edit: How long did you scour through my portfolio before you found that one?

Naw, reading it one time is enough for me thanks. Whether or not I understood any of your post is irrelevant. When I posted the original link to the CBC article, it was to start a dialogue concerning sensitivity issues when photographing people during private moments in public. Apparently, that went over most people's heads as it quickly turned into a thread about the right to photograph as long a dollar is being made and that is more important in the long run. Loretta John being hurt and confused is of no concern to anyone here. It's all about us after all. If that's what's where photog

Chuck, This thread has taken on a life of it own hasn't it. There are too many responses here for me to reply to but I will respond to this one. First: I never did News Photos for "The Money." Then you go on about making 4000.00 a day. How is that not a contradiction? Second: The image that this thread is about has little to do with "Stock Photography" The image in question is on a stock agency website, therefore it has a lot to do with stock photography.