Pat Phillips

Thanks for the spot Clare!

Ta for the spot Nigel!

I have Lightroom 5, so maybe there's a difference. I will edit my post to include my Lightroom version, don't want people reading in the future to use my suggestion if it is inaccurate.

Hi LawrensonPhoto, admittedly I'm using an ancient version of lightroom, but I use the title field for my headline, and it works. Is that not the same for you? Am I doing something really odd with my workflow???

When using Lightroom, you put your headline in the title field. At least you do if you are using Lightroom 5, as I am, so if you are using an older version of Lightroom, that could be what happened to your headline. It's a bit counterintuitive. Without a headline, your images may have been taken down from the news feed unless you got in contact with the news team - I don't know if they can headline them for you but it's worth asking. Can you still see your images?

I'm going to start uploading to live news with an ipad and filterstorm neue pro, and I have a question for anyone who's done this before. Probably sounds like a daft question, but when I add my headline, which field do I use? My possible choices are title, headline and subject. I'm being cautious because I know that with lightroom, I'd use the field "title" rather than headline. Yes, I know I could just go ahead and try the headline field... but if that's wrong, there'll be that sinking feeling when I see my images appear on the feed with the dreaded missing headline. Go on, tell me it's the obvious choice and put me out of my misery! *EDIT* Maybe the reason I got zero replies is because the forum was down, or maybe because it was sooo flippin' obvious... I just filled in both the headline AND title field with my headline, and it worked. Thought I'd report back in the slim chance anyone else was pondering the same thing - though in retrospect I doubt it

Thanks for finding that one Lisa!

Thanks for the spot Nigel... will be interested to see how much this gets me!

Thanks for spotting mine Bryan!

I've had the occasional image licensed for $5 - $7 in the last few months. The most recent was licensed to Metro online who reproduced it at a large scale ... for the princely sum of $5.61. And the image is now all over the internet! I do sell a lot of images through the newspaper scheme so If this stays an occasional thing I can just about swallow it, but if these prices become the norm there's no incentive to stay signed up if images don't even get licensed for a sum that will cover travel expenses.

Just saw that SShep reported a stockimo sale over on the March found photographs thread, so I'll repost it here: 06/03/2016, UK, Observer [Review section], p38, noose, S0KM9G, Andy Pearson / Stockimo [Alamy credit only]

Just found out this has sold... sorry about the massive image

Thank you for spotting that one Clare!

Guardian online, 02/11/2015 http://www.theguardian.com/environment/shortcuts/2015/nov/02/britain-oldest-tree-fortingall-yew-change-sex Image: B0DY81 Credit: Edward Parker/Alamy

If it really bothers you, pick the image that you want to appear first and append an 001 at the front of the filename before upload- or whatever would work best with your own image naming strategy... just basically re-name so that your chosen image will be numerically sorted to the front. But as already stated, that won't influence what actually gets pushed.