Jump to content

Stephen Barnes

Verified
  • Content Count

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

18 Forum reputation = neutral

About Stephen Barnes

  • Rank
    Forum newbie

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.bowlineimages.com
  • Skype
    stepbar

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Belfast, Northern Ireland
  • Interests
    Photo journalism, documentary photography, hard news, bomb scares ;-)

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={8C538405-4B64-4EB6-B3F9-898515F7CB2D}&name=Stephen+Barnes
  • Images
    30382
  • Joined Alamy
    21 Jun 2007

Recent Profile Visitors

733 profile views
  1. An API key is now required, allowing Google to bill for use. The interface hasn't changed apart from this field now being mandatory. The charges seem to be about $2,000 for one million autocompletions: given the advantages to Alamy for location based sales, and the assurance of geospatial accuracy I consider this to be worth it, but I guess I don't know how many requests Alamy users would make, and how much that will eat into profits. I really do hope it returns.
  2. Thanks guys. As an IT consultant by day, I know the root-cause of the problem lies with the user interface design. It's just far too sensitive, and has some daft quirks. I have no problem with any other stock site, or any other website in general - it's just the design of the Alamy Image Manager. Id even happily go back to the original keywording system, as it worked well for me. Spacecadet: my mention of "disability/access" issues is because websites are supposed to be accessible to all, even those with disabilities. This isn't particularly accessible to me, and even "able bodied" people struggle.
  3. Sally - left side and right side of the Alamy Image Manager - left side shows the grid of all images, right side shows the score for the selected image. How can the two be different when one single image is selected? |s for your advice about P60B1K, I 've never found my [recent] keywording style to be a problem when they're relevant (for example in this particular image: "take away" normally refers to fast food, usually burgers and chips, which is always high in fat, responsible for the obesity problem, and the location doesn't matter when it's a generic photo like this. It could be taken anywhere. Many people do say keep keywords relevant to what you can actually see in the image, but I've been pretty anal about analysing (see what I did there?) my search results, as well as the "All of Alamy" results, as well as similars across other stock agencies when available, to see what people buy vs. their search criteria. (My day job is in Big Data Analysis). Generalising: customers haven't a clue how to search for images, It's not their fault, they're generally journalists, or authors, or publishers, not data analysts with a background in taxonomies, data classification or extraction. So, if they have a story about "childhood obesity" they're going to search for "childhood obesity" as their first search - that's only natural. They're not going to search for "fast food outlet", or "hamburger plain ketchup" first - that might be a second or third search. They're not going to search for "Obese child" as that just isn't politically correct these days, so that's not in my list of keywords. I'd rather be in their first set of results to get the sale. FWIW, and getting back on topic, I've found a (time consuming) workaround, but over 10,000 of my images which had been marked as "Not for sale" on the discoverability ranking have now been freed up. I've also determined that these images haven't had any sales, even though they appear pretty parse compared to the images that were discoverable.
  4. The replies seem to be a little off topic - I assume I'm therefore alone in finding this behaviour? It's really a frustrating exercise having to go into all your images that you've already optimised only to find they're showing up in orange on one side of AIM, and green on the other.
  5. I have quite bad arthritis in my hands, and I'm finding the keywording process more and more frustrating because of one simple issue. When keywording multiple images, many of the keywords show up as light grey when they only apply to some of the selected images. I want to select these to add them to all selected images. However, unless the mouse is COMPLETELY still when clicking, all you do is to move the keyword slightly. It doesn't apply to all images. I end up clicking on a keyword, it temporarily darkens, then goes back to grey because my mouse moved by one nanometre. This also happens when I try to promote tags to supertags. This is frustrating, as I find it very difficult to keep my mouse absolutely still and click the button at the same time, meaning it can take me 10 clicks (or more) to select each keyword. This is VERY frustrating! I really don't see why it's necessary to move a keyword anyway, as the order makes no difference (I know you can combine keywords by dragging and dropping) but surely clicking to select is a MUCH more common activity. Can the keyword be selected if you click anywhere within the box, not just on the text? Can it be selected if you move your mouse even a tiny amount? To move a keyword you need to drag the mouse a considerable (relatively) distance. This really is affecting my ability to keyword, and I believe it's a disability/access issue (as well as incredibly frustrating for most people, I'm sure!)
  6. I have a strange problem when using Jim Keir's Alamy Lightroom bridge. I spend quite a lot of effort trying to get my metadata fully optimised (10 supertags/50 tags, and ensuring everything is filled in). The bars on each image shows full green. Not a problem. However, when I use the plugin to do a "Set Alamy Data" the discoverability bar on the left side image grid shows orange, but the discoverability bar on the right side image summary shows full green. It's only when I change the Primary or Secondary Category does it pop back to full green indicating it's optimised. Has anyone else seen this issue, and do you know of a simple solution, rather than having to reset the category on every affected image? https://www.dropbox.com/s/ootwbe8rsltyr62/Screenshot 2018-03-28 20.31.09.png?dl=0 Stephen.
  7. Check out the LR Alamy Bridge plugin. It's got two main functions: "Fetch Alamy Data" which matches your local images with those on Alamy by filename then pulls down the Alamy Metadata. You can update your Alamy data within LR, update Pseuds, keywords etc. Then there is "Set Alamy Data" which allows you to sync your changes back up to Alamy. It's a little temperamental at times, and takes some learning to get the best out of all features (I've only recently felt confident about using the Set Alamy Data feature after about a year of using it!), but the biggest advantage it gives me is the ability to search by Alamy Reference within LR, plus you get to see the number of sales and revenue for each image. You can filter on any of the Alamy data (pseudonym, sales status etc). I've also set up lots of Smart Collections to validate my Alamy metadata (e.g. find images with people, no releases which are RF) or images which are marked Alamy Exclusive, which I have available elsewhere. Probably the most useful LR Plugin I've ever used. Available here https://www.lightroom-plugins.com/AlamyIndex.php should you want to check it out.
  8. The new image manager allows you to filter for images which are "Exclusive Alamy" and "Restricted Images", but doesn't have the corresponding "Non-exclusive Alamy" and "Non-restricted Images". Surely it just makes sense that you can do this? (I have a real need for it to ensure images I have elsewhere are represented properly on Alamy, and without these filters I can't do this!)
  9. "Travel" is a bit of a bug-bear of mine - images of airplanes, hotels, etc could be travel. However, what about a photograph of the Eiffel Tower? It's only travel if you don't live there! I have ended up categorising lots of photographs taken in Belfast as "Travel" as there isn't anything more appropriate. Then there is obvious omissions such as politics, policing, military, society etc. I end up just lumping these into News and Events even though often they are stock, and not news events. The problem with changing them now is that it would involve reclassifying a few thousand photographs.
  10. Just had about 10 reCAPTCHAs to work through just to get logged in this morning - VERY ANNOYING! I have to do this EVERY TIME I log in. Please make it stop!!!!!!
  11. It wouldn't be SO bad if we could actually cut and paste tags from one image to another. I'd also like to be able to see all the tags I've used, to click on one, and to bring up all images with that tag. The main reason for this is to try to tidy up the tens of thousands of images I have which have been migrated from the previous system, which now have individual words as tags which should be compound tags eg. "northern" and "ireland" - should be "Northern Ireland". It wouldn't be so bad if one could select multiple images and merge these keywords, but this only works if every image has fewer than 50 tags (or 10 supertags), and even then sometimes it won't let you. So, PLEASE Alamy, let us merge keywords on multiple images even if there are 50+ tags. It will make it so much easier to have efficient, well tagged images and will therefore help sales!
  12. I get the reCAPTCHA quite often. Annoying, time consuming, and completely unnecessary!
  13. Totally agree - it's a right pain in the proverbial. The workaround is to paste it into notepad, edit it accordingly, then cut and paste back into AIM. But it really shouldn't be like that - it's counter intuitive, and hinders good, accurate keywording, which Alamy is trying to promote.
  14. I've a bit of an issue with this field: does it mean images currently only available from Alamy, or have only ever been available from Alamy? I've got quite a few (!) images which were submitted to both Alamy and Demotix - they were taken into the Getty collection, which have since been removed from sale.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.