Jump to content

Tom Daniel

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Forum reputation = neutral

About Tom Daniel

  • Rank
    Forum newbie


  • Alamy URL
  • Images
  • Joined Alamy
    02 Jul 2013
  1. Thanks All. The various suggestions are all good. I probably misunderstood the Alamy market which is predominantly publication. I come from the school of scan once - purpose many, so bigger original is better. My training is technical, not marketing so I tend to be precise rather than subjective. Member support has confirmed that QC only looks at 100% without taking into account scale factor. The suggestion to downsize anything questionable is a neat way around that. Regarding MDM's comment about Coolscan 4000, that by definition is 35mm which is one fourth the image size of my 4x
  2. I am new to Alamy and sent the requsit 4 submissions for initial QC. They are all Tango drum scans of 4x5 (5x4) film which have been used for fine art prints as large as 40x50 inch. Nobody ever complained about sharpness. All files are 200+ MB Tiff before JPEG conversion. They are 9000x7200 pixels which is about 8 times the output from a DSLR. All were rejected as "Soft or lacking definition". When scaled down to 3600x2880 pixel which is about a 30 MB file they are tack sharp. If QC looks at everything with 100% zoom it is like looking at a transparency with a 30x microscope instead
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.