Jump to content

Keith Douglas

Verified
  • Content Count

    441
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Keith Douglas

  1. FTP is the way to go. I haven't done a Web Page upload for many months. I've just uploaded 4 news images via FTP. Less than a minute per image.
  2. Why don't you try the FTP route instead? If it stops for 22 minutes on an image then it isn't slow - somethings gone wrong. It's dropped the connection or something's timed out.
  3. Pretty good month for me. 7 sales for $363 gross. 2 x $$$, 4 x $$ and 1 x $ All exclusive, direct sales.
  4. The Sun Online, 30 March 2019. KOOKY COUNTRY The bizarre tourist attractions in England you can visit – including an upside down house and a garden full of hidden giants https://www.thesun.co.uk/travel/8732012/unusual-places-and-things-to-do-in-england/ Contributor: Carolyn Jenkins Image ID: R75P0Y Contributor: Paul Quayle Image ID: R4PX2E Contributor: Paul Quayle Image ID: R4Y9FF Contributor: Mark Boulton Image ID: DTK3XD Contributor: Jon Sparks Image ID: H46CG2 Contributor: Julian Crumly Image ID: BH15AJ Contributor: travellinglight Image ID: CRH0C7 Keith
  5. I've done a couple of uploads today and I'm seeing much faster uploads than you report. I use FTP and Filezilla. I'm in the UK. I was uploading to News - newsupload.alamy.com I uploaded 15 images, average size 6MB, about half an hour ago, in 9 minutes, so about 36 secs per image. It's not lightning quick, but I don't think that's a problem at Alamy's end, I get about 12Mbps on download but on upload it's down to about 1Mbps - but that's down to my ISP. Keith
  6. Actually, it was more the other way round. Reading the National News and then finding something local (when I was in Sheffield) to illustrate it.
  7. Interserve, the troubled services company, carrying out a major redevelopment contract for Sheffield University Engineering Department Country: Worldwide Usage: Magazine, editorial print and digital use, cover and/or inside, repeat use within a single issue Industry sector: Media, design & publishing Mid $$
  8. No email received, but my last submission is listed as "Images: 40 Passed: 40" but I can't access them and it says "Image in QC" over each image! Hopefully someone at Alamy will press the button to move them on - maybe even generating an email notification! Keith
  9. Just looked at the first 3 or 4 pages. Nice photos. Captions need to be expanded, have correct spelling and be more specific to the photo. Keywords as well to a lesser extent. E.g. RFKKDK - no mention of an artist or painting RFKKHP - no mention in caption of gondola, gondolier, exact location etc RFXDPW - "An ordinary day in Cappadocia with ballons, Turkey" what time of day? what are the other features in the photo? Balloons - not ballons. RG05P2 "Ballons and uniqe rocks of Cappadocia. An ordinary morning in Cappadoica" VW Camper van? I agree with Paul and I think you have too many similars, particularly of buildings. Whether it affects your CTR and ranking, I don't know, but what it does mean is that instead of having 1389 images on sale you have an effective portfolio that is much smaller - maybe the equivalent of say 500 images. Hope that helps
  10. A related question though is why did the number of images go up so much year on year? There are some contributors who have a very streamlined operation and 100% dedication, and can maybe add 10,000 images per year. I don't think my process is particularly inefficient, but getting an additional 2000 new images per year on sale is challenging. And even then, if I was more ruthless with similars the number per year would be lower. I don't believe that the bulk of the increase in images at Alamy over recent years is from contributors taking and uploading new images. So where are the other images coming from? Is it from collections that exist elsewhere and are then uploaded in bulk to Alamy? If it is then large numbers of images can disappear as rapidly as they appeared in the first place. From an Alamy contributor perspective it's not something that I'm concerned about.
  11. I don't think it's unclear. If the contract doesn't mention any restrictions on changing from RM to RF after a sale (or vice versa) then there are no restrictions! There might be all sorts of things that we think might or should be in the contract, but if they aren't in it then they aren't part of the contract. It's very important to get these sort of details correct, particularly if it's used as a reason why contributors can't ever sell some of their RM images on other sites.
  12. Is that correct? It's possible to change to RF from RM in the Image Manager (previous to IM I don't think it was possible). Is there something else, e.g. contractual that stops a contributor from doing it? I don't think there is and you could sell an image RM last week, then RF this week and back to RM next week.
  13. Guardian Online, 21 Feb 2019 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/feb/21/church-of-england-drops-compulsory-sunday-services-in-each-parish Photo of St Peters Church, Heysham. Contributor: Ian Dagnall Commercial Collection Image ID: C32X4P
  14. Great summary Kumar, sounds like it was a very useful meeting. Hope to get along to another meeting again soon. Keith
  15. It is a lot of hard work, and a long haul to get a reasonable income from stock on Alamy. Of course, it depends what you mean by a reasonable income! I reckon that on average I currently receive, net, about £0.15 per image that I have on sale per year. This ratio could be a bit higher if I eliminated similars, culled poor images (but which ones?), increased the proportion of News etc. But it might give you a basis for some ballpark estimates.
  16. 17 sales for $449 gross. Another 'Best Month Ever' for me, with lots of small value sales making up the numbers and one $$$ sale making up about 40% of the total $
  17. Thanks for the spot Bryan. Was hoping that it might have made it into the print edition as well, but unfortunately not, although the text of the article was on the front page. Times 30th Keith Douglas A branch of the Clarks shoe shop in Penny Street, Lancaster, UK - Image ID: M66E64
  18. They need to be a minimum of 3000 x 2000 pixels if they are in a 3:2 ratio. There's lots of other threads about minimum image size. Keith
  19. I'm sure that they do chase up customers. But they aren't going to spend tens or hundreds or thousands of dollars on admin costs/ legal fees etc. to accelerate the payment of a fee that's tens of $ or less.
  20. I'd rather know as soon as a sale is made. That way I can do a reverse image search straight away to find out any infringements. I've found them a couple of times - people copying images from newspaper articles to their blogs or using them on Facebook. If somebody is only earning $50 every 2 or 3 months, then I really don't think that a contributor just missing the $50 threshold should be on the list of priority items that Alamy needs to address. The answer is for the contributor to submit more quality images and make more regular sales!
  21. I don't think you are doing anything wrong, but the competition is high! Take your shots of Barclays Bank in Bath. Search for Barclays Bank Bath. 7 images of which yours are 4 and 6. If you are a customer wanting an image of Barclays Bank in Bath to illustrate an article which ones are you going to zoom? If you want an image of people protesting against Barclays in Bath then the 6th image might fit the bill but the small image just doesn't say 'Protest' to me. Six months is not a long time to begin to see results, particularly with just 413 images. It was over 1 year before I saw my first sale, so you are way ahead. I just don't think there is any more to know about the search process that you could take action on.
  22. Alamy aren't going to divulge exactly how their search algorithms work from a contributors perspective. Their priority, anyway, should be to refine their algorithms to give the customer the 'best' selection of images that meet the customer's search query. I suppose it's inevitable that contributors want to know the shortcut to getting their images at the top of the search list and zoomed by the customers. I don't think there is any secret key to it though. It's just a long term, steady process to have: Unique images, accurately captioned and keyworded that will get you on the first page of search results. A history of regular sales that will get your images on the first page of search results where many images match the customers search criteria. Strong and/or unique images that are accurately captioned and keyworded to get you zooms.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.