Jump to content

ottertrack

Verified
  • Content Count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Forum reputation = neutral

About ottertrack

  • Rank
    Forum newbie

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    http://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={F6863A8E-AD71-49D1-9A6C-E10B926DD8B7}&name=Leon+Werdinger
  • Images
    10339
  • Joined Alamy
    27 Dec 2011
  1. Among other non-user friendly aspects of the new Image Manager is selection process for Primary & Secondary categories. The 25 options seem like they'd easily fit at one time on a larger drop down menu box but Alamy made the box so small that only 10 categories can be viewed at a time, requiring extra scrolling. It might sound like a silly little nitpick, but the time required for this ads up, and it's frustrating because it seems like such an obviously poor design where doing it right would have been so easy. Here's Alamy's initial response to my suggestion to make life easi
  2. Disappointed to hear that the new Image Manager won't include the obvious improvement, suggested years ago, to allow photographers to put old model releases into an archive folder so that we don't need to sort through every release we've ever uploaded in order to find ones to attach to new images. Makes me skeptical that the new Image Manager was designed with photographers in mind.
  3. Thanks. Glad to know they're working on it. Hope the new version will be much more user-friendly.
  4. Here's something I posted in Feb. 2014 (with the wording slightly updated): Hey Alamy folks - it'd be very helpful to have a way to have two folders or some other way to manage model and property releases so that older ones can be stored in a separate place. As it is, one has to wade through every model release they've ever uploaded in order to access current ones to attach to images. In my case, and likely many others, I don't need easy access to 90% of the releases that I've uploaded because I'm mainly attaching newer releases to newer images. But having to wade through hundreds of re
  5. Hey Alamy folks - it'd be very helpful to have a way to have two folders or some other way to manage model and property releases so that older ones can be stored in a separate place. As it is, I have to wade through every model release I've ever uploaded in order to access current ones to attach to images. Most of the old ones are ones I won't ever need to access again, or if I do, it'd be rare. But having them mixed in with newer ones sure makes finding the newer ones much more time consuming. And of course, if the best way to achieve this is to have two separate folders, it'd be criti
  6. Thanks again Mirco. I was able to find the defaults for the pseudonyms and license types. Now if Alamy would add options for defaults for image type and some of the others that'd be even better. Also appreciate your explanation of the double keywords and the words on my portfolio!
  7. Thanks Mirco. I am using Image Manager 2.4, and use the batch processor, but am not aware of any way to set defaults. If you know of a way please let me know. The keywords embedded in my images automatically populate to the Comprehensive Keyword field, so I just copy them to the Main Keyword field. Do you think that there's any disadvantage to having the same keywords in each field? And another suggestion for Alamy concerning Manage Images: It'd be very helpful to have a way to have two folders or some other way to manage model and property releases so that older ones can be stored
  8. Hi, There are a couple things you could do to make the Manage Images much more user friendly for me: 1. Let users set default settings for Attributes, especially for "What is this image?," "Pseudonyms & Licence types. I always use the same selections on those and I imagine many other contributers do also, so it'd save a lot of time compared to having to manually select each time, even batch labeling. These defaults could of course be easily overridden when needed. "Is this image digitally altered?" would also be good to be able to assign a default answer for. And of course it'd be g
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.