Tsado

Betty, you've raised an excellent point! When I used to teach stock photography workshops, I stressed the importance of consciously shooting verticals. Editors would confide in me that they always had a difficult time finding vertical images for covers, which paid significantly more money. One editor even theorized that perhaps photographers didn't use enough anti-perspirant and were uneasy about raising an arm to shoot a vertical! When you've got that wonderful warm feeling in your gut after beautifully composing and capturing a horizontal image and turn around to walk away from

I agreed that the proposed changes are a good idea making submitting images easier for contributors. Thank you Alamy for asking our opinion.

@meanderingemu Respectfully, how do you find AoA and the search results that show RF and RM? Thanks in advance!

Just passed my previous record high sales (2017), thank you Alamy!

Only one sale so far this month...

Yes, same problem.... I am unable to upload. On Firefox here.

Sheila, I can accept $15 for webs use if the buyer was allowed to only download a small file like 600px x 900px for that price. But to allow a 50MB or 70MB file to be downloaded for $15 simply because the buyer says he is going to use it for web use is insane. You and I both know there are countless other agencies, even microstock agencies, that only allow SMALL files to be downloaded for web use at a lower price.

That's EXACTLY the point! Other agencies only allow MUCH smaller image files for website use!!! So, a Buyer could think to himself, "Whoa, why should I pay a high price when I can get the full size, highest resolution file for only $15". This is totally insane folks!

Click on any RM or RF image and look at the pricing AND resolution size at the right. Is it true that a buyer could check the Presentation size and download the highest resolution size for $15? The highest resolution size is showing for "Website" and "Marketing Package" as well. Tell me THIS IS NOT TRUE!