Jump to content

Floydian

Verified
  • Content Count

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Forum reputation = neutral

About Floydian

  • Rank
    Forum newbie

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/henk-meijer

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Groningen
  • Interests
    Landscape and Travel Photography

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={7E72BACB-3814-46E7-9FD5-BBA2F7D99144}&name=Henk+Meijer+Photography
  • Images
    10999
  • Joined Alamy
    07 Mar 2008
  1. I'm still using the old one to fill in my keywords, works much better for me than the new version.
  2. On Mac OSx login problems with Safari, but not with Chrome.....
  3. iMac 27 inch, 32 gb RAM, 3TB Fusion Drive and Lightroom 6 and Photoshop CS6 run smooth without any problems.....
  4. Many macro photographers stack, which could end up in over 50 exposures for 1 image. As a landscaper i stack too, sometimes a lot when my foreground object is very close to the lens and i can't use my TS-E lens. Using high F numbers results in loosing sharpness, so with F11 and some stacking i get great results. An alternative for Zerene is HeliconFocus. Good luck!
  5. I was done in 60 min, from download, install and restart. But....i was already on El Capitan 10.11.2
  6. Adobe provides a profile builder, so you could build your own. Btw, I do have two or three profiles for my Canon TSE 24 mk1, but none for my 17mm. wim I was never really satisfied with that profile builder. Beside, my 24mm mk2 is so good that i don't see it as a real problem not having a profile for that lens. Henk Yes the mk1 is not very good. The 17mm is quite good. The 24mm mk2 is really good. However the final verdict on these lenses will be on the new 42/50 mp bodies. Until now only extremely few Canon lenses are in the DXO top 100. The best one is the Canon EF 100mm f/2 USM, which I have, at #30. There is not one excellent Canon lens according to DXO. The 100mm (not the macro) is a good lens, though it's not even an L. It's one of the cheapest lenses Canon has, dating back to the early 90-ies. I bought mine new in 2005. I have not used it in ages because it's so full with loose flock hairs on the inside, that it shows in smaller aperture images. (Canon, when asked, denied that flock is being used in that lens. However, when you look into it with a small led light, it's immediately clear the whole inside barrel is coated with it. Maybe that makes it so good.) wim Wim, That whole DXO thing is one big joke! Of course, a Zeiss Otus is a complete different league but when i see my images taken with the 70-200mm 2.8L mk2 the new 16-35mm f4.0 or the 24-70mm mk2 and i see the results in 2 meter prints for commercial work taken with my over 7 year old 1Ds mk3 then this whole DXO is complete BS and only good for pixelpeepers. It's all testing in the lab, high quality printing is something complete different. Every lens has it flaws, but presenting a top 100 and making your choice from that is not how i look at photography at all. Happy shooting ;-) Henk
  7. Adobe provides a profile builder, so you could build your own. Btw, I do have two or three profiles for my Canon TSE 24 mk1, but none for my 17mm. wim I was never really satisfied with that profile builder. Beside, my 24mm mk2 is so good that i don't see it as a real problem not having a profile for that lens. Henk
  8. A T&S lens (Nikon and Canon) is not supported by LR, because there would be no way to know from the photo whether the tilt/shift adjustments has been used and whether the profile would be accurate.
  9. If your lens is not supported by LR 5 then an upgrade to LR 6 might help to solve the problem. Check on the Adobe site if your lens is supported by LR 6
  10. Floydian

    Showing keywords

    Thanks Ian, i will do that!
  11. Floydian

    Showing keywords

    I noticed that showing keywords to everyone is leading to strange results. Others copied *MY* keywords and paste them in in their own images without any corrections! So if people search for my images under my name those images also show up...weird! We all think about our own and maybe unique keywords and others use them just as simple as that. Is this something that can be removed in the near future?
  12. It's working pretty good (Mac osX), i even use it for landscapes. Instead of shooting higher than my favorite F11, i shoot multiple images at F8 or F11 and stack them together for maximum DOF and sharpness. Lately i use more and more my TS-S for maximum DOF, but Helicon is still a very nice alternative. some might say use Zerene Stacker, but both work more or less in the same way...stacking. Good luck!
  13. There are many flaws inside the image. Some stitching problems and lots of dust spots....bad editing when it comes to that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.