Jump to content

photocatseyes

Verified
  • Content Count

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

18 Forum reputation = neutral

About photocatseyes

  • Rank
    Forum newbie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Alamy

  • Alamy URL
    https://www.alamy.com/contrib-browse.asp?cid={536E1FBD-555F-4CB6-8263-3B100AE59222}&name=catherine+A.+lucas
  • Images
    2857
  • Joined Alamy
    09 May 2008
  1. 50/50 IS a good deal. What is NOT a good deal is if we get half of $5 dollars, or half of $1.65... And waiting a year to get to $50 since it needs to be cleared is far from a good deal...
  2. @dustydingo I don't have a clear cut answer, all your points are very valid. The problem is bigger for small sellers. I can imagine that if one is a big and regular seller the problem not really arises as those probably do have monthly payouts. I think regular is the keyword.
  3. If the customer pays in the beginning of the month and the pay out date is the next month as they only have one pay out date in the month. That whole month is intrest for Alamy. Might not be much if the amount is 50 dollar, but if you take all those small payments in the big pool, it amounts to a big sum. If the customer paid but you are not at $50, for beginning and low selling photographers, it can take months before the cleared funds do get paid...
  4. Indeed... I have far more time spend waiting on money than getting money. Right now, I am 19 cents low of getting paid, but am 7 dollar over the pay out amount, yet it has not been cleared. And that takes till a buyer paying, which can easily take another two months. We truly get the short end of the stick in everything. I bet all those unpaid pennies or thousands of dollars bring in good intrest for Alamy...
  5. As regard being loyal to Alamy to the point of making quality fresh images, I stopped going out of my way to do that a long time ago, just the occasional shoot if it comes my way. It's no longer worth the effort for the merger rewards. Elsewhere, I've just received royalty payments of over £3,000 net for just 6 images, that's a years worth of sales here. Now do you understand? Edited 3 hours ago by Tony Yes, I understand. I wished I could for once have sales for 3000 dollar. I also hear it when you say that going truly out of your way to shoot for Alamy is not worth it anymore, or so it seems. Not when you get paid $1.65 or $3 for an image. We sadly enough do not get 50% or more from our images. Over the last year my payment was far closer to 20-30% by the time distribution and distributor have gotten the lion share of my work. Totally discouraging...
  6. This is a minor step in the good direction. Raining on your parade though with the fact that so many photographs are sold for under 3 dollar and less. In fact, Alamy advertises in a lot of spaces that the going rate is 50/50, while over the last four years I believe I have never recieved 50 percent of the sale. And with the Distributor scheme the balance has even tilted worse for the photographers. In the long run, nobody is truly happy with the low sale prices.
  7. OK, you now have officially lost me... :o((( It now looks as if people with no legal knowledge/small print knowledge could be hurt really bad. Guess it is time for most of us to start thinking seriously about all this...
  8. Converting images from other-agency-non-exclusive to Alamy-exclusive-50/50? Do you know every historic license of those images? Nope Can you report them to Alamy? Nope Will that prevent a buyer who licenses under Alamy-exclusive & later learns of a previous, competing or non-competing usage, from suing YOU??? (because contract puts 100% legal onus on YOU) Most likely: Nope Can I add Shite? Why do I feel suddenly very dumb and stupid? We photographers work so hard, only trying to make a bit of money, we invested heavily in gear and getting to grips with knowledge, yet it feels like we are often pulling the short end of the straw...
  9. Thank you Kevin and the others. I did get an email already, but you are probably right that we will get a small print email in January. With a language that I so struggle with, and not having the means to ask a layer to look into it. Which we probably all should do. I will remember to look in April of 2019 to opt out. Truly sad that the main reason that agencies make money - the photographers - seem to be the lowest point of attention...
  10. Skyscraperfan: When I joined in 2008 the payout line was 300 dollars. As a beginner stock photographer it took months and months to reach that 300 dollar. I will definitely look now to opt out of the distribution scheme... I am sure though that there is a caveat to that too..., for the contributor. Sigh. Jeff Greenberg: I can't even get through the small print, way too complicated for my simple photographers brain. I am sure that Alamy is covered all the way, while all the nasty stuff comes down to photographers. Companies buying lots of photographs from Alamy get a discount, but the discount is taken out of contributor's pay. Or so it seems. That is what my single braincell seems to notice. I am loosing courage real fast now...
  11. Sorry Jeff, I forgot to put the post public. I think you should be able to see the link now with the image...
  12. What is wrong with this picture? Alamy makes a sale of 5.45 dollar for one of my images. Which is in itself a joke already. From that 5.45 dollar 1.63 (30%) goes to the Alamy DistriBUTION Commission, 40 % goes to DistriBUTOR Commission, the photographer gets : $1.64. Do we really need to keep working like that? On top of it all, I do not get paid in January because I have only $49.83 cleared, one needs 50 dollars to get paid. That means I do not get paid before I sell another photograph or get cleared when whoever bought my photograph for five dollars pays. Alamy has the money, the buyer who got my picture for five dollars is good. The photographer's payment is moved forward to another month ... or two... What a bloomin disgrace... And then the ceo announces another cut in photographers pay... Nice Alamy, very nice... I thought the going rate was 60-40, to become 70-30. While if you look at the included account oversight it is NOW already 70-30. That means after February I might get nothing anymore for my photographs... I am sure I will get a reply to my email to Alamy with more poppycock... If it were not so sad we would be laughing tears.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10216174176100182&set=a.1083581742827&type=3&theater
  13. You are right SShep, I had never seen that before. But ok, the problem is that if they do search for Catherine Lucas they do find those 20 and none of my 2900... Unless you do go to the advanced search field. Which is very annoying... Would that for instance mean that if you search for sheep you get all your pics because sheep has sshep partially? Just kidding, sort of... I am not too strong with the do's and dont's of search engines, so with my simple brain I would think that if I type in the photographers name I also get the photographers work, and not all the other irrelevant search subjects. I will in the future always put my name and username in the tags to be sure... Thank you for your valuable and smart noticing of what was really happening. ;o)))
  14. Thanks Mr Chapman, I will consider this. I had never thought about adding my name to the keywords. I probably could also go back to the link provided by Alamy themselves... Thanks. I know how to tackle this now!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.