All Activity
- Yesterday
-
Images licensed April 2024
Jansos replied to VbFolly's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Isn’t that a logo/trademark? Should we be worried? (I have a very similar one but taken at Westfield.) -
BILD infringements?
Jansos replied to Jansos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Me too! -
BILD infringements?
Harry Harrison replied to Jansos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Well quite. I almost think I shouldn’t mention it as all pictures had to be removed and all mentions on here expunged. Let’s just say that they were small, they hung up, and they were shaped like t-r-e-e-s! Unless I just dreamt it all up. -
BILD infringements?
NYCat replied to Jansos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Maybe it freshens toxic air???? 😃 Paulette -
BILD infringements?
Phil Robinson replied to Jansos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
I still haven't had a reply to the email I sent on Tuesday. I have sent another. -
BILD infringements?
Nick Hatton replied to Jansos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
You don't want a toxic air freshener 🤣 -
BILD infringements?
John Mitchell replied to Jansos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
There are zillions of logos available at certain other stock agencies. This whole thing strikes me as nonsense. 🙄 -
Jeff Couch joined the community
-
BILD infringements?
Michael Ventura replied to Jansos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
When watching U.S. TV news, I see logos all the time, used when a company is making news, either in good or bad context and I doubt they are going to each corporate office to get the logo straight from the source. Sometimes they are just the logo or a photo of the logo out in the "wild", in context with some sort of structure. -
BILD infringements?
Harry Harrison replied to Jansos's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
It's before my time but wasn't there was an issue with a certain air freshener company on here that became rather toxic. -
WHAT CAMERA IS EVERYONE USING?
Harry Harrison replied to Resolute Inc's question in Community support: ask the forum
Your camera is absolutely fine for Alamy, 24MP APS-C, a very good choice. Unless you are desperate to replace it anyway you might be better asking contributors@alamy.com if they know why your images didn't pass QC, it won't be the camera and if it is then someone has made a mistake. It does happen. -
Measures Again
Richard Tadman replied to ReeRay's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Measures appears to be back, but heaven knows what we have missed in the interim? -
Avpics started following Measures Again
-
Measures Again
Avpics replied to ReeRay's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Indeed. Sadly the database missed out! No update today, which of the two should be the priority. -
I've Been Defeated........
Martin L replied to Martin L's question in Community support: ask the forum
I think this is restricted to Oz, the pic above was taken in the UK -
Measures Again
Alexander Hogg replied to ReeRay's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Ditto gone up a bit plus 2 zooms which is unusual Hopefully sales are on the way -
WHAT CAMERA IS EVERYONE USING?
Gervais Montacute replied to Resolute Inc's question in Community support: ask the forum
Old Nilkon D800 with the 2.8G trinity. Leica Q3. Much easier to carry around. My wife currently uses a Fuji X100. Waiting on a Fuji X100 VI. -
Measures Again
Tony ALS replied to ReeRay's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Yes, more views have been added since this mornings 151 with another 214 added, and a rare (for me) zoom has appeared which has helped my CTR slightly. Hopefully a sign that we're getting back to normal, at least until it falls over again. -
Measures Again
ReeRay replied to ReeRay's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Ditto -
Images licensed April 2024
Steve F replied to VbFolly's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Haha, the relevance did occur to me when I was posting. Maybe that's why it got so many likes 😆 I think Apple has got more money than it knows what to do with, so I should be ok... (famous last words) -
Images licensed April 2024
Ed Rooney replied to VbFolly's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Big building but small sale: $ -
Measures Again
Alex Ramsay replied to ReeRay's topic in Stock photography discussion and contributor experience
Just had another look, and Measures (mine, at least) seems to have been fixed since this morning Alex -
I've Been Defeated........
Jose Decio Molaro replied to Martin L's question in Community support: ask the forum
What I found.... Cephalotus follicularis is a monotypic genus, meaning that it is the only species (follicularis) within the genus (Cephalotus). Cephalotus was first discovered and recorded in 1792 by a French expedition to southern Australia led by Bruni d’Entrecasteaux. Most likely, botanist Archibald Menzies was the first European botanist to be lucky enough to find this wonderful plant with a very peculiar appearance. The word Cephalotus comes from the Greek “kephalotos” which means “head”, referring to the shape of the traps. Folliculus in Latin means “a small bag or bag”, which describes the shape of carnivorous “pitchers”. Source: https://www.portaldojardim.com/pdj/2020/11/18/plantas-carnivoras-cephalotus/ -
I'm usually pretty good at this but I just can't find any ID on this 'plant' growing in some moss. Google lens keeps coming up with Sundew (Drosera) which it obviously isn't. Nothing in any of my reference books. Anybody any ideas? Thanks