Sooty Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 I would be interested in contributors' views on a quality [i.e. enough to pass QC] 'pocket compact'. I'm currently looking at Canon G16, G1X Mk2, Fuji X100s etc. If you use any of these for shooting stock on the hoof, I'd be very grateful for your recommendations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Jordan Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 I use Sony RX100 and Sony RX10 a lot with no QC problems so far. You need to check the "Unsuitable Camera" list and stay away from anything there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foreign Export Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 I think there are quite a few threads on the forum recently that discuss similar issue Not really compact in terms of fitting in your pocket but the fuji xe1 or xe2 are great smaller cameras Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inchiquin Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 My Sony NEX6 fits into a largish pocket with ease and the more I use it the more I'm absolutely delighted with what it will do for me. Alan Edit: I should have said that it fits in the pocket with the 16-50 lens. I can't speak for any other lenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Yates Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 I have been using the Fuji X-PRO 1 for a few months and it is more than capable of passing QC. I tend to use the 60mm f2.4 macro more than the 18mm f2 that came with the camera. Fuji images. 60mm lens Fuji images 18mm lens Regards Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazmander Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Not a compact but very compact is the Panasonic GM1. It takes a range of Panasonic and, I think, Olympus lenses, although I use it with the kit lens only, i.e. as a compact. Early days yet, but so far no problems getting images through QC. Gareth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooty Posted August 28, 2014 Author Share Posted August 28, 2014 Thanks guys...keep 'em coming! Any feedback on the Canon G16? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Betty LaRue Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 I have images in my collection from the RX100 too. Talk about a truly pocketable camera! I thought I lost mine, then ordered the 3rd version. It does have a viewfinder but lost some reach. It also has a ND filter. I haven't had the chance to work it out, yet. I do expect the image quality to be just as good. Betty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Sony RX100 is the tool for me for museums and street photography. Click on pictures for larger view and info Cheers, Philippe Very nice. Which model are you using -- Mk1, Mk2, or Mk3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin P Wilson Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Now I have the X-T1 I use the X-E1 and 18-55 as I would a compact but I accept it is not really pocketable, apart from a field jacket. However I usually carry a small bag of some description with a notebook )paper not computer) and in our variable weather a lightweight waterproof so the slightly larger size is not a problem but I could be tempted by a Fuji X100T. I have thought about getting the 27mm pancake lens for the X-E1 which would pretty well make it big coat pocket size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I would be interested in contributors' views on a quality [i.e. enough to pass QC] 'pocket compact'. I'm currently looking at Canon G16, G1X Mk2, Fuji X100s etc. If you use any of these for shooting stock on the hoof, I'd be very grateful for your recommendations. All those except the G1X are on Alamy's recommended list: http://www.alamy.com/contributor/help/recommended-digital-cameras.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foreign Export Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Some tempting sale prices on the rx100 mark 1 at present Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I wasn't happy with the RX100 image quality except in perfect conditions so I sold it. I do use the G1x sometimes and have had no issues with IQ or QC. The Fuji Xs are the best though. Pearl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I wasn't happy with the RX100 image quality except in perfect conditions so I sold it. I do use the G1x sometimes and have had no issues with IQ or QC. The Fuji Xs are the best though. Pearl I mainly use the Sony RX100 in difficult conditions like dark museum interiors and night shots, situations I cannot manage with my Nikon D700 without a tripod. My preferred setting is "Night Scene" because it still captures in RAW while most other scene settings only record Jpegs. I still don't get it how Sony manages to produce sharp handheld pictures in very dim light (see pictures below) at ................ ISO 125 (in "Night Scene" mode). 1/80 sec at ISO 125 1/25 sec at ISO 125 1/100 sec at ISO 125 Click on pictures for larger view and info Cheers, Philippe Yes those look really good Philippe. I never tried that feature but I haven't missed the camera yet so I don't regret selling it. Pearl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inchiquin Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I wasn't happy with the RX100 image quality except in perfect conditions so I sold it. My experience exactly. I was disappointed with the RX100 and ditched it within a week and got the NEX6. RX100: goes in a shirt pocket but produces iffy quality. NEX6: goes in a trouser or jacket pocket but produces excellent quality. And has a viewfinder. It was a no-brainer for me. Alan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Brooks Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Camera use should depend on the subject matter. Shooting on the street, museums, unplanned candid people, or no tripod in low light, I will use a Sony RX100 downsized to Alamy minimum. Even at optimum lens aperture and downsized, the file is no longer up to my sharpness quality standards for certain subjects. I use a 5D11 for anything requiring sharpness, like landscape or architecture etc. For certain subjects the Sony RX100 is a good camera to use, but it is not a one size fits all. This image, taken with Sony RX100, shows another weakness of the Sony RX100. With the 5D11 and my 100 mm 2.8 lens I could have thrown the distracting background out of focus for a stronger image. This is a planned image of a surfing school that crosses the road every morning to the ocean. I had stopped my car for a similar procession a few days before. When I returned to take the image, I was feeling lazy and left the 5D11 kit in the trunk of the car. Do not fall in love with one piece of equipment. My bad Oh well. Next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I wasn't happy with the RX100 image quality except in perfect conditions so I sold it. My experience exactly. I was disappointed with the RX100 and ditched it within a week and got the NEX6. RX100: goes in a shirt pocket but produces iffy quality. NEX6: goes in a trouser or jacket pocket but produces excellent quality. And has a viewfinder. It was a no-brainer for me. Alan But, Alan, have you noticed that they have been ignoring NEXers in this thread? I'm not happy with this; we were trail blazers just a few weeks (OK, years) ago. I love my NEX cameras and would try to put one in a pocket if my pockets were not already stuffed full of unpaid bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Sony RX100 is the tool for me for museums and street photography. Click on pictures for larger view and info Cheers, Philippe Very nice. Which model are you using -- Mk1, Mk2, or Mk3? Thanks I'm using the Mk1 but often reduce the size to 12mp (36 x 24cm) to get the best quality (especially when shooting indoors in dim light without tripod) Cheers, Philippe Cheers, Phillipe. As someone else mentioned, there are currently some good deals on the Mk1. I don't really "need" one of these since I already have two smallish NEX cameras, but it's tempting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inchiquin Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I wasn't happy with the RX100 image quality except in perfect conditions so I sold it. My experience exactly. I was disappointed with the RX100 and ditched it within a week and got the NEX6. RX100: goes in a shirt pocket but produces iffy quality. NEX6: goes in a trouser or jacket pocket but produces excellent quality. And has a viewfinder. It was a no-brainer for me. But, Alan, have you noticed that they have been ignoring NEXers in this thread? I'm not happy with this; we were trail blazers just a few weeks (OK, years) ago. I love my NEX cameras and would try to put one in a pocket if my pockets were not already stuffed full of unpaid bills. Each to his own I guess. I've just collected a black box from my dealer that says "Fujifilm X-T1" on it, so although I will still use and love my NEX it may take 2nd place in my affections for a while. Alan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I wasn't happy with the RX100 image quality except in perfect conditions so I sold it. My experience exactly. I was disappointed with the RX100 and ditched it within a week and got the NEX6. RX100: goes in a shirt pocket but produces iffy quality. NEX6: goes in a trouser or jacket pocket but produces excellent quality. And has a viewfinder. It was a no-brainer for me. Alan But, Alan, have you noticed that they have been ignoring NEXers in this thread? I'm not happy with this; we were trail blazers just a few weeks (OK, years) ago. I love my NEX cameras and would try to put one in a pocket if my pockets were not already stuffed full of unpaid bills. I have the same problem, Ed. Perhaps it's time I switched to a man-purse, or a "murse" as I believe they're called. Then I could keep all my overdue bills and NEX in the same place. Every camera is a trade-off to some extent. What I find tempting about the RX100 is that it truly is an inconspicuous, take-anywhere camera. I can think of situations where the extra DoF could come in handy as well. Another unpaid bill wouldn't come in handy, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 A murse is the answer, John. Something in mauve or peach with a small follower motif on the side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Mitchell Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 A murse is the answer, John. Something in mauve or peach with a small follower motif on the side. Thanks for the fashion-forward advice, Ed, straight from the Big Apple (or Big Peach). Somehow I don't think that Ernest Hemingway would have approved of real men carrying murses. But then I didn't approve of a lot of things Papa did either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Rooney Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 My own small bag for little cameras is very butch, black and mean looking, just like a smaller camera bag. I have an Upstrap on it. It has just the one chamber to hold my NEX-6 or RX10. If you're interested in Hemingway, you might enjoy reading The Paris Wife by Paula McLain. It's written from the viewpoint of Hadley Richardson, his first wife. It's not an unkind look at Hemingway. He was a man of his time with a great many faults but also some fine qualities; and he didn't just talk the talk. He walked the walk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linda Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 I wasn't happy with the RX100 image quality except in perfect conditions so I sold it. My experience exactly. I was disappointed with the RX100 and ditched it within a week and got the NEX6. RX100: goes in a shirt pocket but produces iffy quality. NEX6: goes in a trouser or jacket pocket but produces excellent quality. And has a viewfinder. It was a no-brainer for me. Alan But, Alan, have you noticed that they have been ignoring NEXers in this thread? I'm not happy with this; we were trail blazers just a few weeks (OK, years) ago. I love my NEX cameras and would try to put one in a pocket if my pockets were not already stuffed full of unpaid bills. Sad Edo...BUT FUNNY,LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooty Posted September 1, 2014 Author Share Posted September 1, 2014 Well, thanks everybody who has contributed...still not entirely sure where I'm going with my credit card but much food for thought. Some in depth reviews on this website which I've found very useful in the past: http://www.dpreview.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.